Legal Opinion

Sweeney & Co. v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 9, 1933PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

The decisive question on this appeal is the sufficiency of the petition charging libel, when tested by a demurrer. William T. Sweeney was engaged in general insurance and brokerage business under the firm name of Sweeney & Co., in the city of Louisville, Jefferson county, Ky., where he resided, 'and Frank H. Brown was engaged in the same kind of business, under the name of Brown & Martin, in the same city, where he also resided.

The Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation of London, England, was a foreign corporation, organized under the laws…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sparks v. McCrearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Kee v. Armstrong, Byrd & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Fite v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Briggs v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Turner v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. CMI, Inc. v. Intoximeters, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1995
  2. Vincent Gahafer v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. Peabody v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Gough v. Tribune-Journal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Gearhart v. WSAZ, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API