Legal Opinion

Gioia v. Annunziata

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 5, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The amendment to the complaint presents the principal point of this controversy, namely, the title to a strip of land one foot wide between the land of plaintiff and defendants. The cor rection of the finding cannot be considered, since no transcript of the evidence accompanied the motion, nor were any exceptions taken as required under our practice. Further, the plaintiff abandoned the method of attack upon the finding which he first made and elected to proceed under General Statutes, § 5832. Careful examination of the evidence leads us to overrule all of the assignments of error predicated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Luce v. Niantic Menhaden Oil & Guano Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. Ferriday v. GrosvenorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Faiola v. FaiolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Staff v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  4. F. & AK, INC. v. SleeperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Pettee v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API