Legal Opinion

F. & AK, INC. v. Sleeper

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 7, 1971PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.

The plaintiff, owner of land in Canton, Connecticut, brought this action in two counts against five named defendants of whom three, predecessors in title to the plaintiff, were defaulted by the court for failure to plead. In the first count, the plaintiff sought damages and the reformation of two deeds as to a portion of the boundary line between its land and the adjoining land of the two remaining defendants, Herbert R. Sleeper and Jeanne B. Sleeper, hereinafter referred to as the Sleepers. The plaintiff asked that the deeds be reformed to conform to the actual intent of the parties by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Craig v. DunleavySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Dennen v. SearleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dotson v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. American Trading Real Estate Properties, Inc. v. Town of TrumbullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Multiplastics, Inc. v. Arch Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  5. Stefanoni v. DuncanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API