Hibner v. Lindauer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
The jury found Mr. Omernik and Mr. Hel-gesen each five percent causally negligent. Upon their appeal, such findings must be examined from the standpoint most favorable to the plaintiff. Rodenkirch v. Johnson (1960), 9 Wis. (2d) 245, 248, 101 N. W. (2d) 83; Heckel v. Standard Gateway Theater (1938), 229 Wis. 80, 82, 281 N. W. 640. If there is credible evidence to support the jury’s answers, such answers must stand. Wintersberger v. Pioneer Iron & Metal Co. (1959), 6 Wis. (2d) 69, 73, 94 N. W. (2d) 136. In Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile Ins. Co. (1954), 266 Wis. 106, 109, 62 N. W. (2d) 549, this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Heckel v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Wintersberger v. Pioneer Iron & Metal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Musha v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chille v. HowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Wirsing v. KrzeminskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Royal Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Burlison v. JanssenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Cheetham v. Piggly Wiggly Madison Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.