Legal Opinion

Musha v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1960PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

This appeal presents the following questions: 1. Did the trial court err in receiving testimony of a police officer concerning a conversation with the minor plaintiff shortly after he was taken to the hospital? 2. Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in admitting into evidence a written statement of the minor plaintiff taken by an investigator for the defendant insurance company? 3. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in permitting repetitious cross-examination of witness Olson ? 4. Did the trial court commit error in refusing to allow the counsel for the plaintiffs to continue…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Klein v. BeetenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kincannon v. National Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Michalski v. WagnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Earley v. WinnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Keplin v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. SchmearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Boller v. CofrancesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Jensen v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Hack v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API