Legal Opinion

Plaza National Bank v. Valdez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1987No. 16519PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

This case arises out of a foreclosure action brought by plaintiff bank. After a judgment and decree of foreclosure were entered, and subsequent to a judicial sale, the district court granted defendants’ motion for extension of the redemption period. The bank appeals the extension. We affirm.

On November 9, 1983, defendants William and Susan Valdez, d/b/a Valdez Salsa Natural, T.M., signed a six-month promissory note in favor of Plaza National Bank for $42,117.98. The note was secured by a first mortgage on some vacant land, and a second mortgage on a residence and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Speckner v. RieboldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Speckner v. RieboldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Merrick v. StephensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Ortiz v. LaneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Cole v. McNeillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jones v. SchoellkopfNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Brown v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Chapel v. NevittNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Smith & Marrs, Inc. v. OsbornNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API