Legal Opinion
Chapel v. Nevitt
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 21, 2009No. 27,127PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} This case arises from a debtor’s desire to redeem his property following a foreclosure proceeding. In resolving the two issues raised on appeal by the debtor, Defendant David Derringer, we first conclude that in the absence of a debtor’s compliance with the redemption statute, NMSA 1978, § 39-5-18 (2007), which requires the debtor to petition the district court and to deposit the sum of money required by statute, the district court is not required to hold a hearing and issue a certificate of redemption. Second, we hold that equity allows an extension to the redemption…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Diversey Corp. v. Chem-Source Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Couch v. WilliamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- San Juan Agricultural Water Users Ass'n v. KNME-TVNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Rosales v. State Taxation & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Rosales v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Cook v. Eastern Savings Bank, FSB (In Re Cook)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.