Legal Opinion

Smith & Marrs, Inc. v. Osborn

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 2008No. 26,978PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1} In this appeal, we consider the right of surface owners Defendants Clay and Jeri Osborn to equitable compensation resulting from oil, gas, and mineral lessee Plaintiff Smith and Marrs, Inc.’s state-mandated obligation to drill and oversee monitoring wells on Defendants’ land. We conclude that (1) the leases at issue do not include express language that permits Plaintiff to drill and oversee monitoring wells without consequence, (2) the implied easements by necessity included in the leases at issue do not create any right that permits Plaintiff to drill and oversee…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Nearburg v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Reeves v. WimberlyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Jicarilla Apache Nation v. RodarteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  5. United Properties Ltd. v. Walgreen Properties, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Benz v. Town Center Land, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Guest v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Arena Resources, Inc. v. OBO, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Arena Resources, Inc. v. Obo, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Nellis v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Ariz.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API