Legal Opinion

City of Goldsboro v. W. P. Rose Builders Supply Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action to restrain the defendants from completing a gasoline filling or gasoline storage station, without obtaining permit from building inspector, and from operating same in violation of a zoning ordinance, adopted pursuant to chapter 250, Public Laws 1923. The two individuals join as parties plaintiff and allege that their property in the immediate vicinity will be irreparably damaged by the completion and operation of the filling station in question.

The defendants answered, set up a number of defenses, and thereafter demurred on the ground (1) of a misjoinder of parties and causes of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Person v. . DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Wood v. . BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. State v. . CorpeningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Alexander v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pharr v. GaribaldiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Horner v. Chamber of Commerce of City of Burlington, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Jarrell v. . SnowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Vance S. Harrington & Co. v. RennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Flemming v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API