Legal Opinion

Flemming v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Issues of fact are sharply raised by the pleadings in this action. The evidence at the hearing of the motion of plaintiffs that the temporary restraining order be made permanent, was contradictory as to material facts. No findings of fact appear in the judgment or in the record. We are unable to determine in the present state of the record upon what ground the temporary restraining order was dissolved.

A city ordinance dealing with a matter of great importance to the public as well as to operators of motor buses on the streets of the towns and cities of this State, is involved in this action.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Goldsboro v. W. P. Rose Builders Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. . SasseenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Flemming v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Hinkle v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API