Legal Opinion

State v. . Kiziah

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1940PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

There was no request made by defendants for nonsuit in accordance with N. C. Code, 1935 (Michie), sec. 4643 (same as 567 in civil actions). The evidence was sufficient to be submitted to the jury on all aspects of the crime. The defendants waived their right to maintain the insufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury by not making a motion as of nonsuit thereon' at the close of the evidence. Gibbs v. Telegraph Co., 196 N. C., 516; Murphy v. Power Co., 196 N. C., 484 (494). Where the defendant does not move for nonsuit as provided by sec. 567 (4643 in criminal actions) in the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
  2. State v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. In Re Will of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Mebane Graded School District v. County of AlamanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of PinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. StegmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. CourtneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. State v. . DegraffenreidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API