Legal Opinion

State v. . Degraffenreid

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1943PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbis is tbe same case that was before us at tbe Fall Term, 1942, reported in 222 N. C., 113, 22 S. E. (2d), 217, with full statement of tbe facts, to wbicb reference may be bad to avoid repetition.

On tbe present trial, as on tbe former, Tbomas (Fat) McLean was a witness for tbe State. His testimony now is quite different from wbat it was then. It is much more damaging to tbe defendant and in many respects in conflict witb wbat be said on tbe original bearing.

On cross-examination, he repudiated much of bis testimony given on tbe former trial, and denied giving it. Whereupon tbe defendant “for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. . BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. State v. . MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API