Legal Opinion
Canadian Tarpoly Co. v. United States International Trade Commission
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 18, 1981No. Appeal No. 81-11Published
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
Sealed Air Corporation (“Sealed Air”) moves to intervene in Appeal No. 81-11, pending before this court, as a party appellee. We grant the motion.
Background
Appeal No. 81-11 involves a petition to the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) filed November 7, 1980, wherein Canadian Tarpoly Co. (“Tarpoly”) requested that ITC declare invalid its June 30, 1979, order issued in Investigation No. 337-TA-56, conducted under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337). In re Certain Multicellular Plastic Film, 206 U.S.P.Q. 244 (USITC 1979). In its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 283 v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Pepsico, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Corvallis, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States Steel Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Paper Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Brett Allen BurseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Canadian Tarpoly Co. v. U.S. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.