Legal Opinion
United States Steel Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Paper Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 31, 1979No. 79-1988PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.
In this proceeding, Scott Paper Company (Scott), the intervenor, opposes the motion filed by the United States Steel Corporation (U. S. Steel), the petitioner, seeking to dismiss its petition for review of the action of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). We grant (a) Scott’s motion for permission to proceed with judicial review of the challenged EPA action, and (b) U. S. Steel’s motion for dismissal, without prejudice to the right of Scott to continue to prosecute the petition for review filed by U. S. Steel.
On June 4,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Medical Committee for Human RightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuller v. VolkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Hunt Tool Co. v. Moore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jacqueline M. Harris, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Spence v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- In Re Appeals of GarenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.