Legal Opinion

L. Grossman Sons, Inc. v. Rudderham

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 5, 1946PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The plaintiff, the payee of a promissory note, obtained a finding in an action against the maker, and the Appellate Division dismissed a report. The note *699bore the signature as an attesting witness of one Palmer, a former employee of the plaintiff corporation, who died long before the trial. The defence was that the note was altered after its execution by the unauthorized addition of the signature of Palmer as a witness. Mindell v. Goldman, 309 Mass. 472, 474.

The fact that Palmer undertook to sign as an attesting witness warranted the inference that he did so regularly and properly with the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Hoffman v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Rummel v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. DiGesse v. Columbia Pontiac Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. West Roxbury Co-operative Bank v. BowserMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Connell v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Davis, Malm & D'Agostine v. LahnstonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API