Legal Opinion

Whittaker v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided June 30, 1924No. 1095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

In this action upon a stay bond, the first count of the complaint sets out the bond in hsec verba, and alleges the condition is payment, if appeal is nót “with effect”; the second count alleges the quoted words were omitted by the debtor’s fraud, inadvertence, or mistake; and the prayer of the first is a money judgment, and of the second is likewise after reformation. The answer denies the condition and omission as in the complaint alleged, alleges res judicata, and limitations to the second count.. At trial, plaintiff dismissed the second count, and both parties, in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Cooke v. Graham's Administrator.Supreme Court of the United States · 1805
  3. Comerford v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hollenbeck-Bush Planing Mill Co. v. AmwegCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. New Farmers Bank's Trustee v. CockrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gary Hay Grain Co., Inc. v. CarlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Doheny v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1940
  3. Ulmen v. National Surety Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API