Legal Opinion

Utah Department of Environmental Quality v. Redd

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2002No. Nos. 20010070, 20010105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:

1 This interlocutory appeal concerns the statute of limitations period for a statutory cost recovery action based on the Underground Storage Tank Act ("USTA"). The defendants, Brent Redd ("Redd"), Woody's Enterprises, and Marathon Oil, filed two summary judgment -motions before the district court, contending that the State's recovery action was barred by the statute of limitations. The district court partially granted these motions, holding that the three-year statute of limitations period established in subsection 78-12-26(4) of the Utah Code barred the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. OstlerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. Huntington-Cleveland Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Estes v. TibbsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. City of Albuquerque v. BrooksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Huitron v. KayeUtah Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Dahl Investment Co. v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  3. Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy v. Questar Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  4. In re Estate of DaviesUtah Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API