Legal Opinion

Dahl Investment Co. v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 4, 2004No. 20040036-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Associate Presiding Judge:

T1 Wayne L. Hughes and Patricia Hampton-Hughes (the Hugheses) appeal the district court's order quieting title to a parcel of land in favor of Dahl Investment Company (Dahl Investment). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 The Hugheses and Dahl Investment own neighboring parcels of land in Syracuse. Van Dahl is one of the general partners of Dahl Investment. Van Dahl's parents acquired the parcel of land directly to the east of what is now the Hugheses' parcel in January 1923. The parcel has since been transferred to the ownership of Dahl Investment. The Hugheses…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. CECO Corp. v. Concrete Specialists, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Gallwey v. GrimmWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Trolley Square Associates v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Q-2 L.L.C. v. HughesUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Bahr v. ImusCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  3. Q-2, LLC v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API