Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy v. Questar Gas Co.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 29, 2015No. 20140050-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORME, Judge:

T1 The Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy (the District) appeals from the district court's denial of the Dis-triect's motion for summary judgment and the dismissal of its claims. We affirm.

BACKGROUND 1

T2 The District owns and operates the Salt Lake Aqueduct (the SLA), a water pipeline that delivers water from Deer Creek Reservoir to the Little Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant before carrying the treated water to various storage facilities. The SLA was constructed between 1989 and 1951 as part of the Bureau of Reclamation's (the BOR) Provo River Project.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Rushton v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Commonwealth Property Advocates, LLC v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Water v. SorfCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  2. C-B-K Ranch v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API