Trefethen v. Amazeen
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
The bill is wrongly entitled “Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction” as the statutory remedy of petition for a declaratory judgment is not available when the rights of the parties can be determined by other proceedings. Webster v. Hubley, 92 N. H. 431.
The validity of a contract between stockholders is to be determined by the effects of its provisions. In Bowditch v. Company, 76 N. H. 351, this Court upheld a stockholders’ agreement for a voting trust applying as a test the conclusions that there was no wrong to the corporation, no special benefit to the parties to the contract and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Com. ex rel. Langdon v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
3Cited by7 opinions
- Guilford Glazer v. Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer, Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer v. Guilford GlazerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows Inc. v. RinglingCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
- E. K. Buck Retail Stores v. HarkertNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Hart v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Sankin v. 5410 Connecticut Avenue CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.