Legal Opinion

Noble v. Safe Harbor Family Preservation Trust

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 9, 2007No. 35227-3-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

¶1 Fred and Faith Noble petitioned to condemn a private way of necessity across Safe Harbor Family Preservation Trust property based on our holding in Safe Harbor Family Pres. Trust v. Noble, noted at 120 Wn. App. 1060, 2004 Wash. App. LEXIS 502 (Safe Harbor I). In answer, Safe Harbor (Paul and Agnes Stokes) alleged that a feasible alternative route existed over the Nobles’ adjoining landowners, Tillicum Beach, Inc. The Nobles then joined Tillicum as a potential condemnee. The trial court found that an existing way over Safe Harbor property was the least burdensome and granted the Nobles an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chuong Van Pham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Chuong Van Pham v. Seattle City LightWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Carstensen v. Chrisland Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  4. Collins v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
  5. SAC Downtown Ltd. Partnership v. KahnWashington Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noble v. SAFE HARBOR PRESERVATION TRUSTWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Noble v. Safe Harbor Family Preservation TrustWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Noble v. Safe Harbor Family Preservation TrustWashington Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API