Legal Opinion

Noble v. Safe Harbor Family Preservation Trust

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2009No. 80873-2Published

1DissentChambers, J.

¶27 (dissenting) — The majority concludes that a trial court may not look beyond the mechanical process of joinder in awarding attorney fees against a party in a condemnation action. While recognizing the broad discretion given to trial courts to award fees under RCW 8.24.030, the majority nevertheless concludes that “the statute does not support awarding fees against a condemnee where that condemnee does not choose to join any other party as an alternative condemnee.” Majority at 23. Because I do not read the statute to say anything of the sort and because the legislature and I believe the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. CzingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. Kennedy v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Kennedy v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Noble v. SAFE HARBOR FAMILY PRESERVATION TRUSTCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Noble v. Safe Harbor Family Preservation TrustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API