Noble v. Safe Harbor Family Preservation Trust
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentChambers, J.
¶27 (dissenting) — The majority concludes that a trial court may not look beyond the mechanical process of joinder in awarding attorney fees against a party in a condemnation action. While recognizing the broad discretion given to trial courts to award fees under RCW 8.24.030, the majority nevertheless concludes that “the statute does not support awarding fees against a condemnee where that condemnee does not choose to join any other party as an alternative condemnee.” Majority at 23. Because I do not read the statute to say anything of the sort and because the legislature and I believe the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sorenson v. CzingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Kennedy v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Kennedy v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Noble v. SAFE HARBOR FAMILY PRESERVATION TRUSTCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Noble v. Safe Harbor Family Preservation TrustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007