Legal Opinion

Carstensen v. Chrisland Corp.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 15, 1994No. Record 930650PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy

This litigation arises from a dispute over whether a pipestem driveway shared by the owners of two adjacent lots and located on their land, is subject to an easement for the benefit of a third adjacent landowner.

Chrisland Corporation develops and builds single-family residential communities. In 1988, Fairfax County approved Chrisland’s Walnut Hill subdivision plans for 18 acres of land and Chrisland began selling lots. In early April 1988, Chrisland entered into a contract with Alvin H. and Marie V Carstensen for the purchase of Lot 25. Shirley M. O’Neal executed a similar contract with…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Womack v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  2. Russo v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  3. Hughes v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
  4. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. O'NEALSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  5. Quesinberry v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Prospect Development Co. v. BershaderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  2. Sloan Ex Rel. Juergens v. Urban Title Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Fairfax Hospital v. CurtisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  4. Brown v. SlenkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Informatics Applications Group, Inc. v. ShkolnikovDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API