Legal Opinion

Noble v. Safe Harbor Family Preservation Trust

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2009No. 80873-2PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

¶1 C. This case arises out of a condemnation action for a private way of necessity. It asks us to determine whether, under RCW 8.24.030, the trial court had the discretion to require the original condemnee to pay an alternative condemnee’s attorney fees and to reduce the original condemnee’s award of attorney fees due to the alternative condemnee’s involvement in the action. Fred and Faith Noble (Nobles) filed a petition to condemn a private way of necessity across Safe Harbor Family Preservation Trust’s (Safe Harbor) property to gain access to the Nobles’ property. Safe Harbor (condemnee)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Carlson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Beckman v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Sorenson v. CzingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Kennedy v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. SentinelC3, Inc. v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Cornish College of the Arts v. 1000 Virginia Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. In re the Guardianship of LambWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Humphrey Industries, Ltd. v. Clay Street Associates, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API