Legal Opinion

M. A. Long Co. v. Keystone Portland Cement Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1930No. Appeal, 9PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiff filed a mechanic’s lien against defendant’s properties, and caused a writ of scire facias to be issued upon it. Defendant’s affidavit of defense was held in sufficient, and judgment entered for $155,098.37. From it the present appeal was taken.

Before the case was reached for argument in this court, appellant presented to us a petition praying that the record be returned to the lower court, in order that an application might be made therein “to open the judgment and for leave to file a supplemental or amended affidavit of defense.” A rule to show cause…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Clay Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Bauer v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Wolf v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Levine v. Pittsburgh State BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. McCloskey v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Com. Ex Rel. Paige v. Smith, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. ROSE v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Vallish v. RapoportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Kuntz v. Lanbar Hotel Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Malis v. Homer Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API