Legal Opinion

Kelly v. International Clay Products Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1927No. Appeal, 322PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

In the court below, defendant filed a petition praying that the service of the summons should be set aside; a rule to show cause was granted; plaintiff answered; defendant elected to have the matter disposed of upon petition and answer, without the taking of testimony; the rule was discharged and, as authorized by the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, defendant forthwith appealed from the order thus made. Under such circumstances, we are required to determine only the relevant issues raised by the petition and answer, and, in doing so, must accept as true the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knight v. West Jersey RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wentz v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Dehne v. Hillman Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. United States v. Cummins Distilleries CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  4. Hild v. DunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. ROSE v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API