Legal Opinion
United States v. Fox Lake State Bank
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 19, 1963No. 61 C 1498PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAROVITZ, District Judge.
This is a motion of defendant bank for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The United States has presented a 71 page complaint alleging that defendant bank has filed 21 false claims with the Federal Housing Administration in violation of Section 231, Title 31, U.S.C. Under the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. 1703, the Federal Housing Administration is authorized to insure qualified financial institutions for loans made “to improve the basic livability of real structures.” The government charges that defendant made 21 fraudulent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Ritter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
- United States v. RohlederCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Lennard L. MeadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Cooperative Grain and Supply Co., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Charles HughesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Ridglea State Bank, United States of America v. Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.