Legal Opinion
United States v. Hangar One, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided August 4, 1975No. CA-74-H-646-SPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
HANCOCK, District Judge.
This action, filed by the United States of America under the False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 231-235) and for fraudulent breach of contract, is before the Court for decision on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Those acting for plaintiff in the premises represent this action to be a completely justified effort (a) to recover damages allegedly sustained from a series of covert, surreptitious and fraudulent activities by the defendant over an extended period of time and (b) to impose upon defendant certain civil penalties provided by law for…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Paul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HANGAR ONE, INC. (Formerly Known as Southern Airways Company), Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- McCarthy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Alsco-Harvard Fraud Litigation Consolidated CasesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
- United States v. Board of Educ. of City of Union CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Kirschner Bros. Oil, Inc. v. PannillDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.