Legal Opinion

Barker v. Francis

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 13, 1987No. 860151-CAPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Appellant Robert Barker (“Barker”) and Respondents Dr. Howard Francis and his brother Dr. Larry Francis (“the Doctors”) entered into an Earnest Money Agreement whereby Barker would exchange farmland and water stock for the Doctors' ranch in Nine Mile Canyon (“Nine Mile Ranch”). The Doctors refused to perform, and Barker brought this action seeking specific performance and/or damages.

The trial court found that the Earnest Money Agreement was an enforceable contract but denied Barker’s request for specific performance due to impossibility of performance and awarded him…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sternberger v. . McGovernNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Ashton v. AshtonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Grays Harbor Paper Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Provo City Corp. v. Nielson Scott Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bangerter v. PoultonUtah Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Heiner v. S.J. Groves & Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. PDQ Lube Center, Inc. v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  4. Grahn v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Cooper v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API