Legal Opinion

Fazzio v. Mason

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2011No. 36068PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

Appellant Edward J. Mason (Mason) breached two agreements to purchase farmland (the “Properties”) from Respondents. Mason admits that he breached the agreements but appeals the district court’s decision to award specific performance to Respondents. Mason argues that specific performance is not an appropriate remedy in this case because he cannot comply with the award, contract damages provide an adequate remedy at law and specific performance results in a windfall for Respondents. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On April 12, 2006, Mason entered into an agreement…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. DiGiuseppe v. LawlerTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. P.O. Ventures, Inc. v. Loucks Family Irrevocable TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Johannsen v. UtterbeckIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Hector B. Almaraz, Jr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Jerry K. Davis v. Harmony Development, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Schneider v. SchneiderIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Reeder v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. Desert Palace, Inc. v. MichaelDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API