Legal Opinion

Kessler v. Tortoise Development, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2000No. 24711PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the district court, on remand, granting specific performance of a real estate purchase and sale agreement. In Kessler v. Tortoise Devel., Inc., 130 Idaho 105, 937 P.2d 417 (1997)(Tortoise I), this Court determined that the purchase and sale agreement was ambiguous as to the availability of specific performance and vacated a summary judgment granted in favor of the seller. After a court trial on remand, the district court determined that specific performance was available. The court found that it would be inequitable to deny specific…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bondy v. LevyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bedal v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Williams v. Idaho Potato Starch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Garner v. BartschiIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Strunk v. Chromy-StrunkNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. City of Kellogg v. Mission Mountain Interests Ltd., Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Troupis v. SummerIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Fullerton v. GriswoldIdaho Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API