Legal Opinion

Houser ex rel. Houser v. Dan Dugan Transport Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1985No. C7-83-1578PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether a grandchild of a decedent killed in an accident which occurred while he was in the scope of his employment was a “child” within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 176.011, subd. 2 (1982) and, therefore, entitled to dependency benefits. The compensation judge held that the granddaughter was not a “child” and denied dependency benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversed that decision and awarded dependency benefits. We affirm.

Russell Houser was killed on October 12, 1981, as the result of a two-truck collision…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. ViktoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Van Overbeke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Fitzpatrick v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. In Re Estate of TilghmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kruse v. Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims BureauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API