Legal Opinion

Kruse v. Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims Bureau

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 23, 1985No. C6-85-6, C0-85-163PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This consolidated appeal arose out of two separate actions brought to recover basic economic loss benefits pursuant to the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 65B.41 — 65B.71 (1984). Appellants Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims Bureau and Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. appeal from the trial courts’ orders granting respondent Carla Kruse’s and respondent Lorraine Andersen’s motions for summary judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

Carla Kruse, who did not own an automobile, was injured on February 15, 1983, while a passenger in an uninsured motor vehicle…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Bartholet v. BerknessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Mickelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Pederson v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. TateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Green ex rel. Deuel v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API