Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Kelly

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1976No. 36747PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.

In an action for unpaid architectural fees plaintiff had a verdict and judgment. Defendants appeal, but their brief fails to comply with rules of appellate procedure.

Rule 84.04(d) requires appellants’ briefs to state the points relied on, pointing out “what actions or rulings of the court are sought to be reviewed and wherein and why they are claimed to be erroneous.” Disre*563garding that simple rule, these appellants’ points relied on are these:

“I. The court erred in allowing plaintiff to testify that the homes were built from plaintiff’s plans.
“II. The court erred in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Donnell v. Vigus Quarries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Kellin v. ACF Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glasnapp v. State Banking BoardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Mayfield v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Corning Bank v. HagerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API