Legal Opinion

Kellin v. ACF Industries, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1975No. 36583PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Kenneth W. Kellin claimed Workmen’s Compensation benefits, contending he injured his back while working in an awkward position with a heavy grinding machine, and that the injuries required a surgical laminectomy. Both the Referee and the Industrial Commission denied the claim, as did the Circuit Court on appeal. Plaintiff has appealed to this court.

Plaintiff’s brief preserves nothing for appellate review. Rule 84.04(d) requires an appellant in his points relied on to state briefly and concisely what actions or rulings of the court are sought to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marie v. Standard Steel WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Lane v. KattMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Payne v. St. Louis Grain Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Behlman v. City of FlorissantMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Stokes v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Minton v. ACF Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API