Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Lillard

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1963No. Civ. 10273PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

Defendants, dissatisfied with a jury award in condemnation, appeal.

They are the owners of 300-odd acres of farm land adjoining U.S. Highway 40 (Sacramento to San Francisco) on the south. Their place (hereinafter “the Lillard” place or property) is located approximately one-half mile east of Richards Boulevard, described as the “feeder” street from the highway into Davis.

Prior to October 1958 the portion of U.S. 40 involved was a 4-lane limited access freeway. Commencing on that date it was being converted into a 6-lane freeway with no access except at designated interchanges.

In the “before”…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People v. RigneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Foster v. City of Detroit, MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
  3. Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Simmons v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API