State v. Behrendt
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Dissent
Hill, J.:
I must respectfully dissent on one point. I would hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it considered the opportunity costs as a factor to be included in any restitution order. I refer to the losses a retail merchant sustains when deprived by a thief of the opportunity to sell that merchant’s goods at retail.
The calculation of such amounts is straightforward. For example, if a merchant, such as the victim here, was selling beer and a thief stole 100 cases of beer, the thief took not only the beer but also deprived the merchant of ever selling those 100 cases.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. CrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- The United States of America v. Fred CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.