Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Behrendt

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 27, 2012No. 105,222Published

1Dissent

Hill, J.:

I must respectfully dissent on one point. I would hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it considered the opportunity costs as a factor to be included in any restitution order. I refer to the losses a retail merchant sustains when deprived by a thief of the opportunity to sell that merchant’s goods at retail.

The calculation of such amounts is straightforward. For example, if a merchant, such as the victim here, was selling beer and a thief stole 100 cases of beer, the thief took not only the beer but also deprived the merchant of ever selling those 100 cases.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. CrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. State v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. State v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. The United States of America v. Fred CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API