Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 2007No. 31830PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Chief Judge.

Katherine Smith appeals from her judgment of conviction for three counts of grand theft. Specifically, Smith asserts her sentences are excessive under the facts. Smith also appeals from the district court’s order denying her I.C.R. 35 motion and from the district court’s order of restitution. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part, *690reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The victim in this case owned an outdoor recreation store which employed Smith as an office manager. Over the course of Smith’s one-year employment, she conducted…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. ReinkeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Zolman v. Pinnacol AssuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  3. State v. CottrellIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. Jerry Allan HillIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. CardIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API