Legal Opinion
The United States of America v. Fred Cummings
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 13, 1986No. 19-5079PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Fred Cummings (Cummings) was convicted in district court of selling stolen property pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2315. He appeals, claiming the trial court’s jury instruction on the valuation of stolen property was erroneous, the government failed to prove sufficient value, the admission of a similar but subsequent conviction was improper, and the court’s limiting instruction on the conviction was inadequate. We affirm.
The stolen property described in the indictment was the cab portion of a 1979 Peterbilt tractor-truck. The entire tractor-truck was stolen…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Frank Grady and John JankowskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. William Earl BurkhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Malcolm Edward Bridwell, United States of America v. Gregory G. Schwab, United States of America v. Susan Anita BoydCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. David v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Loran Anthony BiswellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Robert RuheCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. William Esch, United States of America v. Linda EschCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Bruce BonnettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Steven Lynn GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Aaron CuchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.