State v. Hall
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Beier, J.:
This appeal, before us on petition for review, asks whether retail cost or wholesale cost is the appropriate measure of loss for determining restitution for stolen inventory. Our answer is: “It depends.” We reject a bright-line rule favoring either retail *710or wholesale cost. The sentencing judge must evaluate the evidence, weigh all factors, and consider the facts and circumstances of each case to determine a value that will compensate the victim for the actual loss caused by the defendant’s crime.
Factual and Procedural Background
Defendant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Illinois Central Railroad v. CrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. HunzikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. AldersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. YoungerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
- State v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
- State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.