Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 28, 2013No. Nos. 102,297; 102,663PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beier, J.:

This appeal, before us on petition for review, asks whether retail cost or wholesale cost is the appropriate measure of loss for determining restitution for stolen inventory. Our answer is: “It depends.” We reject a bright-line rule favoring either retail *710or wholesale cost. The sentencing judge must evaluate the evidence, weigh all factors, and consider the facts and circumstances of each case to determine a value that will compensate the victim for the actual loss caused by the defendant’s crime.

Factual and Procedural Background

Defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. CrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. HunzikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. AldersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. YoungerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  4. State v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API