Capitol Steel and Iron Company v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
We are asked to resolve the following question: If a collective bargaining agreement contains a provision permitting an employer to grant wage increases to any of its employees in any amount, is the employer shielded from unfair labor practice charges based on the grant of such increases, regardless of the timing and manner in which it bestows them? In the case before us, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) held that although Capitol Steel & Iron Company (“Capitol” or “Company”) had a contractual right to grant raises without bargaining, it unilaterally granted…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Reno Hilton Resorts v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Heartland Plymouth Court MI, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Providence Hospital and Mercy Hospital v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- State v. Public Safety Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Brent Electric Company v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.