Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

BABY F. v. OKLAHOMA COUNTY DISTRICT COURT

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 2015No. 113,527PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, V.C.J.:

RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

1 1 Baby F. was one of several siblings the State of Oklahoma sought to take into its emergency custody in an Application to Take Minor Children Into Emergency Custody filed on April 4, 2018. At that time, three-month-old Baby F. had allegedly been diagnosed with several anomalies and genetic issues. 1 The State alleged that the mother appeared to be under the influence of substances and the family could not care for the children, including Baby F. The State also made other allegations concerning the ne-gleet of Baby F.'s siblings.

1 2 In…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  2. HILL v. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  3. BRAITSCH v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. MAREE v. NEUWIRTHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API