City of Downey v. Gonzales
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
This appeal arises from an order for costs after judgments in an action in eminent domain brought by the City of Downey for the purpose of building a municipal hospital. Under one complaint, multiple parcels were sought to be condemned. Multiple persons had interests in various parcels. Some persons had interests in multiple parcels. Each person with an interest in any parcel was named as a defendant. The appellants here, 28 in number, are but a portion of the named defendants. The parcels involved here are 15 in number, and are but a portion of the total number of parcels condemned. Of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
- City of San Francisco v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Fields v. Napa Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rappenecker v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Elrod v. Oregon Cummins Diesel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- City of Downey v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968