Legal Opinion

Slaten v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1988No. L.A. 32323PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

The Review Department of the State Bar Court has recommended that petitioner, Thomas M. Slaten, be disbarred from the practice of law in California. Petitioner presents a number of contentions but all hinge on his assertion that he was incompetent and unable to assist in his defense during a substantial portion of these proceedings. As we shall explain, our review of the record of these proceedings leads us to conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support this assertion and consequently that petitioner’s contentions are lacking in merit. We will adopt the review…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. SamuelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Palomo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re PossinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Frazer v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Walker v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Ligon v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Ainsworth v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API