Legal Opinion
Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. Camelback Office Park
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1988No. CV-87-0124-PRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Petitioner, Coldwell Banker Commercial Group (Coldwell), seeks review of a court of appeals’ opinion holding that it breached a real estate broker’s duty of good faith to its principal by showing additional properties to a prospective tenant and thereby forfeited its right to a commission. We granted review to consider the scope of activities a broker may lawfully undertake on behalf of multiple principals. See Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17A A.R.S. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Coldwell is a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. Melson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Hardy v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Baker v. LeightArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- McEvoy v. GinsbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Jones v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Sonnenschein v. Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & IvesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Kaman Aerospace Corp. v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Sonnenschein v. Elliman-Gibbons & IvesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.