Legal Opinion

Sonnenschein v. Elliman-Gibbons & Ives

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 24, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenberger, J. P.

The question presented by this case is whether a real estate broker breaches its fiduciary duty to the seller by showing other sellers’ apartments to a prospective purchaser. We conclude that a broker is entitled to show multiple sellers’ properties to the same prospective buyer, absent any restriction to the contrary in the agreement between broker and seller.

In the summer of 1990, plaintiffs Irving and Martha Sonnenschein listed their Manhattan condominium apartment for sale with a real estate broker, Phyllis Koch Real Estate (Koch). The original asking…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henry L. Fox Co. v. William Kaufman Organization, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. McEvoy v. GinsbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  3. Dickstein v. Del Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Foley v. MathiasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Shah v. DeBuonoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Lens.Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Petrello v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  3. Sonnenschein v. Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & IvesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Suthers v. Amgen, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Apace Communications, Ltd. v. BurkeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API