Legal Opinion

McEvoy v. Ginsberg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 5, 1963PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reabdob", J.

This is an action of contract to recover a broker’s commission. The jury found for the plaintiff. The case is here upon the defendant Benjamin Ginsberg’s exceptions to the denial of Ms motions for a directed verdict and for entry of verdict under leave reserved. Both exceptions raise the issue of whether the case was properly submitted to the jury. Barton v. New York, N. H. & H. R.R. 332 Mass. 345, 346. The evidence is to be considered in its aspects most favorable to the plaintiff. Holton v. Shepard, 291 Mass. 513, 515. Kaplan v. Henry Wenz, Inc. 331 Mass. 480, 481.

The pertinent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Holton v. ShepardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. John T. Burns & Sons Inc. v. HandsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Berenson v. NirensteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Sherman v. Briggs Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Flynn v. WallaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Bonin v. Chestnut Hill Towers Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Ira H. Shinberg v. Paul BrukCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. Sonnenschein v. Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & IvesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Bonin v. Chestnut Hill Towers Realty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API