Legal Opinion

Weems v. North Franklin School Dist.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 10, 2002No. 19024-2-IIIPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

37 P.3d 354 (2002)

109 Wash.App. 767

James WEEMS, Appellant,

v.

NORTH FRANKLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent.

No. 19024-2-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Six.

January 10, 2002.

James L. Weems, Kennewick, for Appellant.

Jeffrey Ganson, Attorney at Law, Seattle, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, J.

This is a dispute over the termination of a school district special education director and psychologist for misconduct. A district can terminate a certificated employee for material and substantial performance deficiencies, but only if the deficiencies are unremediable. However, a district need not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Go2Net, Inc. v. C I Host, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. Go2Net, Inc. v. CI Host, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Federal Way School District No. 210 v. VinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Keever & Associates, Inc. v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. KEEVER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API