Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Boelt

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1980No. L.A. 31267PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

May a policeman injured during a high speed chase of a reckless traffic offender recover damages for his personal injury from that person? We conclude that such recovery is precluded by reason of the so-called “fireman’s rule,” which bars certain tort causes of action by firemen and policemen injured during the course of their hazardous occupations. (See Walters v. Sloan (1977) 20 Cal.3d 199, 202-207 [142 Cal.Rptr. 152, 571 P.2d 609].)

The facts are not disputed. On February 28, 1977, plaintiff Hubbard, an on-duty San Diego police officer, while parked at roadside, was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Solgaard v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Giorgi v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Kocan v. GarinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Holden v. ChunestudeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Pottebaum v. HindsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Neighbarger v. Irwin Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Mahoney v. Carus Chemical Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Calatayud v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API