Legal Opinion

Gerber Garment Technology, Inc. v. Lectra Systems, Inc. And Lectra Systems, S.A.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 10, 1990No. 89-1743PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, No. 1:86-CV-2054-CAM, denied the motion of Gerber Garment Technology, Inc. (Gerber) for summary judgment that United States Patent No. 3,790,154 (’154) was infringed and not invalid, denied Gerber’s request for a preliminary injunction, and granted Lectra Systems, Inc. and Lectra Systems S.A.’s (Lectra’s) motion for summary judgment that claims 15 and 16 of the ’154 patent are invalid for obviousness-type double patenting in view of claim 23 of United States Patent No. 3,495,492 (’492). Gerber appeals…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Emanuel M. Glaros, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. H.H. Robertson Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Application of Guido H. Stempel, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  5. Intermedics Infusaid, Inc. And the Infusaid Company v. The Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. In Re David C. PaulsenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Helifix Limited v. Blok-Lok, Ltd. And William Scott Burns v. Helifix North America Corporation, Third Party CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. General Electric Company v. Nintendo Company, Ltd. And Nintendo of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Intel Corporation v. Via Technologies, Inc., a California Corporation, via Technologies, Inc., a Taiwan Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API